The main difference between Cobalt and Royal Blue is brightness and saturation: both are blue shades, but Royal Blue is lighter and Cobalt is more saturated. Cobalt and Royal Blue are often confused but differ in brightness, saturation, and undertone. Cobalt (#0047AB) and Royal Blue (#4169E1) each have distinct characteristics and best uses.
Four real design scenarios, with the recommended pick based on hue, saturation, and WCAG contrast.
Cobalt is more saturated (100% HSL vs 73%) so it reads as bolder and more memorable at logo scale, while Royal Blue can feel washed out when printed small.
Cobalt hits a 8.44:1 WCAG contrast against white — safer for text-heavy interfaces — where Royal Blue only reaches 4.85:1 and risks failing AA at small body sizes.
Royal Blue is a cool-leaning tone that flatters spring/summer collections and warmer skin undertones, while Cobalt leans cooler and is better suited to autumn/winter layering.
Royal Blue is the more muted of the two (73% saturation) and sits more calmly on large wall surfaces, while Cobalt's higher chroma can overwhelm a room when used beyond accent pieces.
Cobalt (#0047AB) is a dark, vivid blue with a cool undertone — it feels rich, serious, substantial and bright, energetic, eye-catching.
Royal Blue (#4169E1) is a medium, vivid blue with a cool undertone — it feels balanced, versatile and bright, energetic, eye-catching.
Text legibility depends on the contrast ratio between foreground and background. WCAG 2.1 AA requires at least 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text; AAA requires 7:1. Use these numbers to choose accessible combinations for your design.
Each color has a dedicated page with shades, tints, CSS name, pairings, and color psychology.